A federal judge in Dallas has blocked the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) near-total ban on noncompete agreements, which was set to take effect next month. This ruling has significant implications for tax practices and professionals across the United States.
The FTC's proposed ban aimed to make labor markets more competitive by prohibiting noncompete agreements, which restrict employees from working for competing businesses or starting their own for a certain period after leaving their current job. An estimated 20% of workers, or roughly 30 million Americans, are subject to these agreements, including many tax professionals.
Judge Ada Brown sided with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a Texas-based tax firm in their lawsuit against the FTC. She ruled that the agency lacked the authority to enact such a broad ban and deemed it "unreasonably overbroad without a reasonable explanation."
For tax practices, this ruling maintains the status quo, allowing them to continue using noncompete agreements to protect their investments in employees, client relationships, and proprietary information. Many tax firms rely on these agreements to prevent key employees from taking clients or sensitive information to competitors.
However, the legal landscape remains uncertain. The ruling creates a division in the judiciary, as a federal judge in Pennsylvania had previously sided with the FTC on this issue. The FTC is considering an appeal, which could potentially lead to a review by the conservative U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.
If the ban were to be implemented in the future, it would significantly impact tax practices. Tax professionals would have more freedom to change jobs or start their own practices without restrictions. Firms might face difficulties in retaining clients if key employees leave to join competitors or start their own businesses. Tax practices would need to find alternative methods to safeguard sensitive client information and proprietary methodologies. Firms may need to revise their compensation packages and employee retention strategies to remain competitive without non-compete agreements. Some firms might become hesitant to invest heavily in employee training and development without the protection of noncompete clauses.
While the FTC's ban is currently blocked, the agency stated it will continue to address non-competes through case-by-case enforcement actions. This approach may still impact tax practices involved in disputes over noncompete agreements.
Tax professionals and firms should closely monitor developments in this area, as the final outcome could significantly affect their business practices and employment strategies. The ongoing legal battles and potential appeals mean that the future of noncompete agreements in the tax industry remains uncertain.
In the meantime, tax practices should review their current noncompete agreements and consider alternative methods to protect their business interests, such as strengthening confidentiality agreements, especially non-disclosure agreements, and implementing robust data protection measures.
Christine Gervais is a licensed CPA, using her skills to help businesses grow and achieve their fullest potential. Christine has a Master’s degree in accounting from Southern New Hampshire University in addition to holding her CPA license for over a decade. Notably, Christine is a nationally recognized speaker providing education to other CPAs on how to best serve clients as well as instruction on a wide variety of topics for business owners on how to maximize success. Christine prides herself on the value she can bring to clients with her extensive tax knowledge and provides strategic, forward-thinking financial strategies to help clients grow. When not behind her desk, you can find Christine spending quality time with her daughter and stepson or tending to the family’s excessively loved farm animals.
Like what you're reading?
Subscribe to our FREE newsletter and we'll deliver content like this directly to your inbox.